|
Identifying Cleopatra
|
|
02-01-2010, 10:18 AM
(This post was last modified: 02-01-2010 11:03 PM by rinus.)
Post: #21
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: Identifying Cleopatra
Hello Phil,
Here again. For a part I was right. The yard had plans to update the 33, as this boat existed for about 13 years without much modifications. In fact it was the old 1000 boat. The owner of the yard then was Eastwood Marine .They took a standard 1000 hull and decided to design, or modify, the hull that it coulds accomodate a shaft and rudder. The underwater ship was extended. And they put a V drive into the hull. The then 1150 became the 3750 . They also added a means for a fly bridge. The interior was the same as the 1000, or 33.. Later on the 3750 became the 38. But the performance was a bit a disappointment The boat was slower than the boats with the heckdrive. So they just made a few of these boats with a shaft. Probably no more than 3 or 4. So it must be that you have one of these boats. Cleopatra decided after these 4 not to make shaft driven boats anymore But I am not sure how to call your boat. In fact it is not a 33, but more a 3750. And may be you may call it a 38. But in fact all serial built 38 have a heck drive. You may wonder how I know these facts. I once had a good contact with the once Technical manager of Cleopatra. He worked there all his live, and we had a communication by e-mail. So I collected a lot of fact etc. of him. I hope these data are of interest to you. Regards, Rinus Done by Rinus, owner of Waterman, a Cleo 850 The Netherlands |
|||
|
06-15-2010, 01:32 PM
(This post was last modified: 06-15-2010 01:45 PM by philwantsacleopatra.)
Post: #22
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Identifying Cleopatra
(01-20-2010 09:52 PM)rinus Wrote: Hello Phil(?), Rinus, This makes sense. I assume you mean by a heck drive that is what we call here a 'leg'. or outdrive. I believe that the hull was not suitable for shaft drive as this one only reaches 12 to 14 knots with two 180 hp engines. I think the original design was suitable for outdrives. In most other respects the boat is excellent. It is very roomy and has excellent stowage space. I have found out now that the hull was built in 1982 by Eastwood Marine and fitted out later in 1991 by Lincoln Marine. I dont know whether it would ever be worth re-instating legs or heck drives. There would be lots of problems as the the boat has hydrolic steering and autopilot too. The history is interesting, especially the part about the shaft drive boats being a dissapointment speed wise. Phil smith (06-15-2010 01:32 PM)philwantsacleopatra Wrote:(01-20-2010 09:52 PM)rinus Wrote: Hello Phil(?), |
|||
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|

Search
Member List
Calendar
Help


